On July 17, 2014, the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania ruled on the issues regarding Act 13 that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had remanded to it in the Supreme Court’s December 2013 decision. The Commonwealth Court held constitutional Act 13 provisions providing (1) notice requirements related to spills should be made to public drinking water systems, without the same notice requirement for private drinking water systems [Section 3218.1], (2) physician non-disclosure requirements, prohibiting healthcare professionals from disclosing to others regarding the composition and quantities of hydro fracturing constituents [Section 3222.1], and (3) granting certain natural gas transport, storage, or sale corporations the power of eminent domain [Section 3241(a)].
However, the Commonwealth Court determined that Section 3305, which provided the Pennsylvania Utility Commission (“PUC”) with the ability to review zoning ordinances for compliance with Pennsylvania law and to withhold distribution of impact fee funds to communities with noncompliant ordinances, was unconstitutional. As a result of the Supreme Court decision to strike down portions of Act 13, the Commonwealth Court found that municipal ordinances related to drilling remain under the jurisdiction of the respective county Courts of Common Pleas, and that Section 3305 was not severable from the remainder of Act 13.
The PUC has appealed the ruling on Section 3305 to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
Click here to read the Commonwealth Court decision.
Act 13’s Impact Fee revenues are expected to surpass $630 million through 2014.
The majority of the funds are distributed to counties and municipalities across the Commonwealth for a variety of uses including environmental, public safety, infrastructure, emergency response and conservation programs.
Read the entire article on Pennsylvania Business Central here.
The NLRB Reissues Ambush Election Amendments to Union Election Procedures – February 6, 2014
Earlier this morning, the NLRB revived its proposed amendments to the representation election procedures that would dramatically cut down the time between a union representation petition and the actual union vote by employees. Read our latest alert on why this matters and what employers can do in preparation.
The Shale Play Today – January 2014
The latest issue of The Shale Play Today is out. This issue discusses the Pennsylvania Supreme Court striking down key provisions of Act 13, shale deals responsible for $1.14 billion and more. Read it now.
[Note: This article was first posted here, in The Shale Play Today: August 2012.]
Despite the Commonwealth Court’s recent decision striking down Act 13’s limits on municipalities enacting zoning ordinances more restrictive than the state’s uniform requirements, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (“PUC”) has begun enforcement of Act 13’s impact fee provisions. Specifically, the PUC has started to review some municipalities’ ordinances that seek to regulate drilling activity.
The results of the PUC’s reviews could prevent some municipalities from receiving their share of the new drilling impact fee this fall if PUC officials determine the municipal ordinances are out of compliance with Pennsylvania law. The provisions of Act 13 that were upheld give the PUC broad powers to enforce Act 13’s requirements. If a local ordinance is found to conflict with state law, municipalities would be ineligible for fee revenues until the ordinance is amended or the decision is reversed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. As such, the PUC is now attempting to distinguish which municipalities’ ordinances fall under the zoning section that was struck down, which might be inappropriate under the upheld provisions of Act 13, and which are in compliance. Complicating this process is whether the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will hear the appeal of the Commonwealth Court’s ruling on an expedited basis, as it is expected that the Supreme Court will take the appeal.
Lastly, the PUC has received several requests for advisory opinions from municipalities throughout Pennsylvania as to the scope and limits of the PUC’s power under Act 13. The PUC has not yet responded to any of the requests for advisory opinions nor are the advisory opinions binding on the municipalities. Thus, despite, the Commonwealth Court’s ruling, the PUC is moving full speed ahead with exercising its new authority under Act 13. This is evidenced by the recent report that the townships of South Fayette and Robinson, located in the southwest corner of Allegheny County, upon the written request of leaseholders, are having their drilling ordinances reviewed by the PUC. The PUC gives municipalities 20 days to file a response. The PUC then has 120 days to issue a ruling. The township’s impact fee revenues could be withheld until the PUC’s review is completed or the ordinance is revised.
Click here to read a recent news article on this subject.
Posted by Kevin M. Eddy. Mr. Eddy is an associate with Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC. His primary area of practice is litigation, with an emphasis on the transportation, construction, and oil and gas industries.